:ellie: Noëlle the 8-Bit🏳️‍🌈🎄 is a user on elekk.xyz. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.

@noelle I definitely prefer Flask simply because it's pretty lightweight and lets you pick-and-choose other stuff as you need it, whereas Django comes with a lot of other baggage.

@noelle im a fan of building stuff in flask but django is likely gonna be a lot easier

@noelle django, but that's the AP lib that lacks right now

@noelle I was thinking about doing one in Django

@alice @noelle
Y'all wanna check out clubeleven? It's a stub of a Django AP app I started for prototyping Aardwolf stuff.

github.com/jfmcbrayer/clubelev

@gcupc @noelle yes! I read the background on the name you wrote. very clever. I love it.

@noelle Pylodon is using Flask. So it does work with Flask. But I haven't seen an implementation using Django yet.

@noelle +1 for Django. I've never understood the charge that it's too "heavy" when talking about projects with more than 100 lines of code.

@noelle +1 for django.

I saw django-activity-stream.readthe but it's about Acivity Streams 1.0 (ActivityPub is based on 2.0). Maybe It can be usefull ?

@noelle You could probably do either. Incidentally, I work with the creator of Flask. 😛

If you do go with Django, though, I know someone trying to build a multi-protocol federation library for it: github.com/jaywink/federation

@noelle actually, looking at it further, I'm not sure it actually requires Django.

@deadsuperhero @noelle
Looks like that library doesn't require Django, just provides additional integration with it.

@0x1C3B00DA A federated Reddit-style link-sharing site, if I'm lucky.

@noelle sweet! This is the third AP link aggregator I've heard about this week. That's awesome.

@0x1C3B00DA Oh, really? That's actually a little discouraging, since I'm pretty sure anyone else working on this would be more competent than I am. I don't want to put work and emotional investment into this and then have nobody use it because there are better alternatives.

@noelle Nooo. Sorry! I didn't wanna discourage you. I've only seen one post each from the other two so I don't know if they have a working implementation. And each implementation could fill a different niche, depending on their speed, lightness, UX, etc.